*** Please note, this page (and web site) are in early development.
Items are certainly not complete, and may be inaccurate.
Your information, comments, corrections, etc. are eagerly requested.
Click here to e-mail Ed.
Please include the URL under discussion. Thank you ***
|Date of first manufacture||-
|Number produced ||-
|Estimated price or cost||-
|location in museum ||-
Contents of this page:
From "Digital at Work" , Digital Press, copyright 1992, page 25
An Innovation in
In the early years of Project Whirlwind, Jay Forrester recognized the limitations of the
computer memory systems then available. Electrostatic storage tubes, magnetic
drums, tapes, and disks lacked the speed and reliability required for the project. With
Forrester's invention of random-access
coincident-current core memory, information could be extracted immediately rather
than searched for sequentially on tapes or disks.
Working with graduate student Bill Papian, Forrester's invention led to an array of ferrite
magnetic materials for storing information. In his thesis, entitled "A Coincident-Current
Magnetic Memory Unit" (1950), Papian described magnetic core memories,
honeycombs of minute magnetic cores strung on wires, through which storage
information was read to electronic circuits in the computer. This invention provided the
speed and reliability the project required.
The first bank of core memory was installed in the Whirlwind on August 8, 1953.
Computing speed doubled, and useful operating time increased to more than
90 percent. The same year, Raytheon, Remington Rand, and RCA
shifted commercial machine storage emphasis to
magnetic core storage, followed a year later by IBM. Although initially unappreciated
except by the engineers, scientists, and researchers working on this new technology,
its impact on the history of computing would be great.
Interesting Web Sites
From Dr. Mike Williams, Curator of the
Computer History Museum
While I was away in LA I managed to talk to a man who ran a core memory
company. He indicated that there were only a couple of firms that were in
the business of suppling OEM core memories and that many many computer
companies used these rather than try and make them for themselves.
The major players were:
Now if your core plane has TM on it, then I assume that it must be made by
Telemeter Magnetics - this might make it easier to find some specs on
exactly what currents it takesto drive it etc.
- FABRI-TEK owned by a Mike Nicholson in Minneapolis
- (didn't make cores, but only assembled them) see Note 1 below
- Telemeter Magnetics (TMI) - later purchased by AMPEX
- (based in LA - both made cores and assembled them)
- General Ceramics (held some of the patents on cores) in N.J.
- Core Memories Limited (CML) in Ireland - an offshoot of DataProducts Ltd
- Electronic Memories Inc. (EMI) an offshoot of Ampex.
Grant Saviers adds
I think you can add
Henry Crouse bought DEC's core memories before he bought RCA. Next time I see him I ask for his list of suppliers.
- Ferroxcube (Saugerties, NY sp?) - OEM supplier of core & planes
- RCA - Waltham, MA or nearby & Taiwan - OEM & RCA supplier of cores and planes
- DEC - bought the RCA core making facility and Taiwan stringing. Only made for DEC
- IBM - only made for IBM
from Rudi Fischer < firstname.lastname@example.org > May 16, 2012
came across your webpage " magnetic cores" and noticed that you did give us at Fabri-Tek some credit with the cores. Yes Mike Nicholson was with Fabri-Tek but we all knew him as the President.
On your next line it states that they did not make cores only assembled them. Here is where I can add some insight into Fabri-Tek, Inc. After my discharge in 1968 from the US Air Force I went to work for Fabri-Tek in Fort Washington Industrial Park, Fort Washington, PA. Although I had to start as a janitor, only spot they could create for me, I became Quality Control Manager within six months and yes our product were memory cores.
When I first arrived there we manufactured A5060. "A" being the designation of the first family of cores manufactured by us, the other two numbers were the size and speed of the core. We engineered a "B" version but I don't recall the numbers. Not long after we began the C 3040, smaller and faster. The "D" version never made it past the engineering stage before we managed to produce the E1418.
Because of the poor acceptance rate during production of memory cores, as Quality Control Manager I was allowed to do research of my own and came up with a new way of firing and then cooling the cores which gave us a yield of 80+% compared to under 50% acceptance. The E1418 was the largest number of cores produced by us. As a little background we produced the ferrite powder in-house, pressed the larger cores using old Aspirin presses and finally went to a continues belt press made in France to press the E1418. This pressing procedure increased our production by almost 40%.
Testing came next and all of our test machines were assembled and wired in-house. Cores then came to me and each vial containing 1000 to 2000 cores would be sample on a small hand jig. Depending on the vial size samples were counted and rejects noted and a pass or fail stamp affixed. I would then pack the vials and send them to Hong Kong for stringing.
If there is anything else you may need to know please let me know.
If you have comments or suggestions, Send e-mail
to Ed Thelen
Go to Antique Computer home page
Go to Visual Storage page
Go to top
Updated May 16, 2012